Why EMC's bid for Data Domain will pay off

VP lays down future plans to integrate de-dupe technology

Earlier this month, EMC signed a $2.1 billion agreement to acquire data deduplication specialist Data Domain, declaring victory over rival Network Appliance in a bidding war to acquire the company.

The deal was remarkable because Joe Tucci, EMC's chairman, president and CEO, along with other senior EMC executives, had no opportunity to conduct the usual due diligence on Data Domain or even get to know its management team before bidding to buy the company.

The all-cash acquisition offer represents a huge bet for EMC, which will buy Data Domain at a price of $33.50 per share-- more than 100 times higher than its earnings per share of 31 cents over the last 12 months. That price represents EMC's strong belief in Data Domain's technology, which identifies and removes redundant data and files when they're being stored, saving storage space and cutting costs for companies.

Since clinching the deal to acquire Data Domain, EMC executives have had a chance to get a closer look at the company and its technology, and say they like what they see, despite the very high earnings multiple they paid to acquire it.

When the acquisition deal is completed, Frank Hauck, EMC's executive vice president of global marketing and customer quality, will help oversee Data Domain and its integration into EMC's storage business unit. Hauck has set out how he sees the acquisition panning out.

The Data Domain acquisition is pretty much a done deal at this point. How are things going?

We had folks up there last week, really for the first time, learning about the company and what they do. The acquisition went outside the normal way of doing an acquisition. We had a lot of folks there, getting up to speed on the products and the people and technology. We had some calls at the end of last week and everyone walked away incredibly impressed. So far, the results have exceeded what our expectations were as far as what they have and what they are capable of doing. It looks pretty good.

How was this acquisition process different from other EMC acquisitions?

There was already an offer from Network Appliance for Data Domain. We felt that this was technology that we wanted to make part of EMC, so we bid on top of their bid. We didn't really have a chance to do any due diligence. Normally, when you do these things you drop a few people into a company, you look around and figure out what they have, the leadership team, and you make a decision about whether you want to buy them based on some insight and knowledge that you have from spending time there.

We really went after this thing with very limited insight. It was really based on understanding the technology and we had some relationships that we had developed over the years, but they were still probably not strong. We had an awareness, folks knew each other. But we did a lot of this based on the product set, not really understanding even the leadership team that was in place, but based on how strong the product set was.

Once the acquisition was accepted, last week was really the first chance we had to that level of due diligence. Everyone was looking around, wondering what they would find, and what they found was pretty good stuff.

Without the ability to do that kind of due diligence, how did you arrive at a valuation where you were comfortable with a price-earnings multiple that's above 100? Well, you see them in the marketplace and their financial results are public. So, you understand how well they're growing. Our sales force would see them in accounts, they would get footholds. They had a product that was, in many cases, very tough to compete with. It provided really good features and functionality, and we had a lot of joint customers. It became one of those situations where we felt the technology warranted a further look.

When we made the decision to move on them, it was really based on technology. We had a series of people around a table and our CEO said, "OK, you see these guys are out there, someone else has made an acquisition offer. What do you want to do?" Everyone said we should go after it, so we went after them.

We basically tried to overshoot the bid that was out there in the marketplace previously. It didn't go through the same type of valuation process as other deals, but everyone knew the product was really strong. You go in a little bit, not knowing what you would normally know, but we feel like the bet was worth it and so far people are walking out of there feeling like we made the right call.


What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 500 characters.


Characters remaining: 500

Related Applications news

Microsoft Office 2010 beta available for download

Developers can get hands on software preview

Microsoft reveals Silverlight update plans

Version 4 to beef up out of browser application support

Microsoft beta to shake up directory services

Developers to bake access control into applications

Salesforce launches own social networking app

Chatter could be 'Facebook for the enterprise'.



Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

Techworld White Papers

Database security: Preventing enterprise data leaks at the source

IDC discusses the growing internal threats to business information, the impact of government regulations on the protection of data, and how enterprises must adopt database security best practices...

Download Whitepaper

Service-oriented security

SOA has become an integral part of enterprise software by providing a framework to efficiently develop software as services that is easily sharable, reusable, and integrated. No where is the need more apparent than in the Identity Management space. Welcome to the age of Service-Oriented Security (SOS).

Download Whitepaper

Data protection prospective vendor checklist

Organisations need a way to map business needs against all these challenges in procuring a technical solution. To help, SANS has developed the following Prospective Vendor Checklist.

Download Whitepaper

Unlock the power of the mainframe

This whitepaper presents the notion of CICS as an integration hub based on a component-based, service-oriented architecture supporting Web services. Highlights will review the challenges and contrasted support for Web services natively in CICS.

Download Whitepaper

Techworld UK - Technology - Business

COLT White Paper

Are all VoIP services the same?

Questions to ask your service provider to ensure you get the VoIP service you need
With careful choice of partner, your business can have all the advantages of VoIP access - reduced costs, flexibility and simplicity - without the drawbacks.
This white paper is your guide to ensure you get right the VoIP service and details the pitfalls which businesses would do well to avoid.

Download white paper
BMC

Ride the express lane in the journey to speed ITIL adoption

Explore the challenges in making the journey to ITIL and the criteria for selecting consulting services
By following ITIL practices, your IT organisation will become more closely integrated with the business. We recommend making the journey to ITIL in a sequence of six incremental steps, the phases of which are driven through execution of a strategic transformational roadmap.

Download white paper

Webcast: IT Financial Management: Cost Optimisation for Efficiency and Agility.
On Demand Webcast
Join this webcast to learn about the techniques and technologies that can help you prove the value of IT to the business by understanding the true cost of today's IT services and those that will be necessary to deliver future success.

Register Today

Site Map

IDG Network

* *