Follow Us

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message

Why you shouldn’t upgrade to Windows 8

Give users an OS that won’t make their computers behave like third-rate iPad knock-offs

Article comments

[This article should be read in conjunction with Why you should upgrade to Windows 8]

I'm writing this in a Microsoft Word 2010 window that fills less than half of my screen. Also visible are two Chrome windows - one containing my inbox, the other some pages relevant to this article - and Windows Media Player, which reports to me that I'm listening to Beethoven's Seventh Symphony. I can easily get to any installed program with a few clicks of my mouse.

You can probably guess that I'm not using Windows 8. I have a copy of it set up on another PC for testing purposes, but for the PC I do my work on, I need a powerful and versatile operating system that lets me arrange programs and windows as I see fit. For these purposes, Windows 7 qualifies; Windows 8 does not.

Windows without windows

Does anyone at Microsoft understand that Windows is called Windows because it has windows?

That seemingly obvious fact harkens back to a time before the geniuses in Redmond decided to weigh us down with the Interface Formerly Known as Metro (which Ill abbreviate to IFKaM). The Windows 8 Start screen has no windows. At best, you can display two programs side by side, and even doing that is impossible if your screens horizontal resolution is less than 1366.

But the lack of actual windows isn't IFKaMs worst flaw. You can still organise the Start page by dragging your productivity apps, your media players, and your utilities into separate groups; however, IFKaM doesn't allow you to arrange your programs hierarchically, like folders on a hard drive or submenus on the Start menu. Instead, you must accept an arrangement where everything is displayed up front.

The crippled Windows desktop

Windows 8 retains the old user interface, which is now officially called Desktop, but in a sadly hobbled form. You cant use Desktop as your default interface. You can't boot into it or close Windows from it. On the other hand, you can manage files in Desktop. There's no IFKaM equivalent of Windows Explorer.

Even worse, Microsoft has removed the Start menu, except for a cut-down version called simplified start. Introduced in Windows 95 and improved many times since, the Start menu has evolved into a brilliant work of convenience.

Think about all you can do with the Windows 7 Start menu. You can pin shortcuts to programs to its top level, but you dont have to, because the programs you use frequently show up there automatically. Each shortcut contains a menu of recently used and recently pinned data files.

Two operating systems, little common ground

To make things worse, the two separate interfaces dont play well together. Going from one to the other is just plain crazy.

Windows 8 includes two versions of Internet Explorer - one for each environment. But they don't work together very well. When you create a Favorite in the Desktop version, it appears only in the Desktop version. Create a Favorite in the IFKaM version, and it still appears only in the Desktop version. (The IFKaM version also has an option to pin a webpage to the Start screen, increasing the congestion at that overcrowded location.)

It could have been so much better

Microsoft totally missed the boat here. We don't need a confusing mix of Desktop and IFKaM applications. We need an OS that can change its user interface when we change our hardware.

It should all be configurable, and you should be free to decide what criteria create the change or you should have the option of sticking with the interface you prefer.

Alas, Microsoft didnt choose that route. So Ill stay with Windows 7 for as long as I can, and hope that the company fixes everything in Windows 9 (or better yet, Windows 8 SP1). And if Microsoft doesn't? Well, that's why we have Apple and Linux.

[Now read: Why you should upgrade to Windows 8]


Share:

More from Techworld

More relevant IT news

Comments

Muneeb said: Well written I hate to see people going gaga over Windows 8 Totally not worth it And what happened to that media player Same old 12It is now primitive and did I mention useless Windows 7 for now Windows 8 never



Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:

PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

Techworld White Papers

Choose – and Choose Wisely – the Right MSP for Your SMB

End users need a technology partner that provides transparency, enables productivity, delivers...

Download Whitepaper

10 Effective Habits of Indispensable IT Departments

It’s no secret that responsibilities are growing while budgets continue to shrink. Download this...

Download Whitepaper

Gartner Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Information Archiving

Enterprise information archiving is contributing to organisational needs for e-discovery and...

Download Whitepaper

Advancing the state of virtualised backups

Dell Software’s vRanger is a veteran of the virtualisation specific backup market. It was the...

Download Whitepaper

Techworld UK - Technology - Business

Innovation, productivity, agility and profit

Watch this on demand webinar which explores IT innovation, managed print services and business agility.

Techworld Mobile Site

Access Techworld's content on the move

Get the latest news, product reviews and downloads on your mobile device with Techworld's mobile site.

Find out more...

From Wow to How : Making mobile and cloud work for you

On demand Biztech Briefing - Learn how to effectively deliver mobile work styles and cloud services together.

Watch now...

Site Map

* *