Follow Us

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message

Can virtual PCs save desktop Linux?

In turn, will Linux make desktop virtualisation more attractive?

Article comments

Desktop Linux has floundered for three main reasons: too few applications, limited desktop hardware compatibility, and too few tools (not to mention skilled people) to manage a boatload of Linux desktop systems.

Desktop virtualisation, on the other hand, has had trouble getting off the ground because the value proposition falls just short of compelling. Sure, over the long haul, the benefits of centralised administration outweigh the investments you must make in server hardware, network bandwidth, and the transition to thin clients. But when you throw in the cost of VMware plus one Windows and Microsoft Office license per user, you may have trouble finding the "R" in "ROI."

So what happens if you put desktop Linux and desktop virtualisation together? If it were an all-open-source solution, the cost equation wouldn't even be in the same ballpark.

As InfoWorld executive editor Galen Gruman wrote last year, desktop Linux - in particular, Ubuntu - has come a long way in usability. And last April's release of Ubuntu 10.04 further improved the look and feel with the new, more polished Light interface. As for applications, there's OpenOffice, of course, but also version 3 of Lotus Symphony, which is IBM's most serious attempt yet at a free-as-in-beer alternative to Microsoft Office.

As for open source virtualisation, to take one example, Red Hat updated its Enterprise Virtualisation offering to include support for desktop virtualisation last March. I hasten to add that we have not tested this package or KVM (kernel-based virtual machine), the open source hypervisor on which it is based, though the InfoWorld Test Center plans to do so this summer. I'm not making endorsements. What I'm just saying is that all the pieces are available for you to assemble.

What might happen when you put those pieces together? Well, in addition to vastly lower cost than a Microsoft-based solution, if you use thin clients, then very obviously all potential Linux compatibility problems with desktop hardware evaporate. You also pretty much eliminate all endpoint security vulnerabilities. I'm not naïve about the time and effort that might be required to get such a bleeding-edge VDI solution up and running, nor do I want to imagine what desktop video and audio problems might ensue. But I bet some sufficiently zealous Linux admins could get it all to work.

Of course, no office that depended on Windows desktop applications beyond productivity software would consider such a solution. Plus, there will always be file compatibility problems -documents with special formatting created on Microsoft Office apps may not display or print exactly as they should using Office alternatives and vice versa. (And of course, there's the biggest showstopper of all, when users give you a look that says: "What is this?!")

But as a generic solution for generic office needs, the cost seems positively irresistible compared to the license-heavy Microsoft/VMware version of desktop virtualisation. In fact, if I were starting a small business, I'd consider that or a cloud-based solution like Google Docs or Zoho before I'd seriously contemplate paying $400 or $500 per user for Windows and Office, whether or not all that Microsoft stuff was wrapped into a desktop virtualisation solution.

Even at the corporate level, a fundamental shift may be occurring. Last month I spoke about the impact of open source on IBM customers with Bob Picciano, general manager of worldwide software sales. He cut right to the chase: "If you're asking me whether Microsoft is a lot less relevant now, the answer is absolutely yes."

So if you're already bound and determined to escape Microsoft's clutches, and the benefits of server-based computing sound attractive, it's worth considering. As isolated solutions, desktop Linux and desktop virtualisation have major shortcomings; together they have the potential to be a stronger Microsoft alternative. And an open source desktop virtualisation solution might be better than handing the family jewels to Google Apps. After all, before long, Google may be every bit as big as Microsoft.


Share:

More from Techworld

More relevant IT news

Comments

Joe N said: Save Linux from what from morons like you

Mike said: The reasons for the floundering of Desktop Linux are missing the most obvious and important one the lack of preinstalled OEM machines and the attendant marketing The selection of machines especially laptops is very limited The OEMs dont want to disturb their relationship with Microsoft

joe said: this is the dumbest thing ive read all weekduh what do you think everyone is doing with linuxman where do they get these guys microsoft flunkies

BK said: Stopped reading once I read your reasons Go back to bed dude

zod said: The only thing desktop Linux needs to be saved from is FUD

Where have you been? said: Lets cut it Im a professional When I started using Linux in 2000 I still had dual boot But in 2010 there isnt a single thing I cannot do under Linux Better I install FOSS applications under Windows in order to do the very same thing Dia Graphviz LyX are indispensible tools to me as is a WAMP installation OpenOffice is good for MS-Office compatibility Development is leaner meaner and more versatile under Linux What do you need more




Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:

PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

Techworld White Papers

Choose – and Choose Wisely – the Right MSP for Your SMB

End users need a technology partner that provides transparency, enables productivity, delivers...

Download Whitepaper

10 Effective Habits of Indispensable IT Departments

It’s no secret that responsibilities are growing while budgets continue to shrink. Download this...

Download Whitepaper

Gartner Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Information Archiving

Enterprise information archiving is contributing to organisational needs for e-discovery and...

Download Whitepaper

Advancing the state of virtualised backups

Dell Software’s vRanger is a veteran of the virtualisation specific backup market. It was the...

Download Whitepaper

Techworld UK - Technology - Business

Innovation, productivity, agility and profit

Watch this on demand webinar which explores IT innovation, managed print services and business agility.

Techworld Mobile Site

Access Techworld's content on the move

Get the latest news, product reviews and downloads on your mobile device with Techworld's mobile site.

Find out more...

From Wow to How : Making mobile and cloud work for you

On demand Biztech Briefing - Learn how to effectively deliver mobile work styles and cloud services together.

Watch now...

Site Map

* *